Is Famed Fiduciary Advocate Ron Rhoades Ready to Concede Defeat?

April 22
01:21 2014

For years, Ron Rhoades has traveled the country-side, lobbied government regulators and, in general been a de facto spokesman for the adoption of a universal fiduciary standard. He’s written papers, published blogs and led panel 519008_84368395_game_over_stock_xchng_royalty_free_300discussions at conferences from sea to shining sea. He’s been the Shining City on the Hill, a bright beacon by which the righteous and pure could confidently steer their corporate vessels. And his consistent message of Fiduciary Duty proved no mere rhetorical device, for he once fell on his own sword for its sake.

So it was with great surprise when, speaking before a packed audience at the monthly FPA chapter meeting in Rochester, New York, a “Flash!!!” blazed across the PowerPoint slide and Rhoades admitted, “As a pro-fiduciary advocate, I am (nearly) ready to concede defeat.” He then offered these predictions to the stunned audience: The DOL’s new Fiduciary Rule will not apply to IRAs and the SEC will offer a “New Federal Fiduciary Standard.” This new standard would include the same suitability standard as currently practiced by non-fiduciaries but with “casual disclosure” requirements added on. In Rhoades words, this would be a “FINO” – a “Fiduciary In Name Only.”

How did we get to this point on where we go from here? Rhoades, who serves as Program Director of the Financial Planning Program at Alfred State College, offered his insights on the winners and losers, challenges and opportunities wrought from “The Fiduciary Wars.”

First, he described the two sides in this long battle – the suitability standard vs. the fiduciary standard. He likened the former to an “arms-length relationship” whereby the salesperson or distributor placed themselves between the product manufacturer and the customer. Although this is a classic “caveat emptor” situation, the sales folks do have several obligations, including not to lie, cheat or steal, as not to misrepresent the product; not to affirmatively disclose (unless imposed by statute or regulation); and, to only offer what is “suitable” to the client (i.e., the products don’t have to be the best).

The fiduciary standard, on the other hand, places an adviser in between the client and the product suppliers. It’s built on a relationship of trust. The elements of trust include: 1) being an expert; 2) due care; 3) acting in the best interests of the client; 4) loyalty; 5) complete honesty and candor; and 6) acting in utmost good faith.

This battle centers around one behavioral focal point – how does the adviser act when a conflict of interest is present. Fiduciary advisers immediately and affirmatively disclose material facts; they then ensure client understanding by obtaining informed consent; and, they continue to act in the best interests of the client.

Rhoades emphasized this last bit. He repeated “disclosure does not negate continuing fiduciary duty to act in the best interests” of the client. He added “it is fundamental that a client will not consent to be harmed.”

How has the SEC responded on this battlefield? They, as well as Congress, talk the talk but don’t walk the walk, according to Rhoades. He pointed out the “SEC said… Let’s raise ‘the standards of those on the edge to the level of the standards of the best.’” He also told the group a senator once said “Let this new organization promote ‘truly professional standards of character and competence.’” Despite this lofty prose, the SEC today will neither apply nor enforce the fiduciary standard already on the books. Rhoades explained that, “despite limits on estoppel and waiver in fiduciary law… [the] SEC permits firms to: negotiate to not be a fiduciary; and, disclaim core fiduciary obligations.

Although he admits he’s nearly ready to concede defeat, the defeat of which Rhoades speaks may be likened to more of a single battle than the entire war. He implies the battle to win the hearts and minds of the regulators and politicians appears to have been won by the deep pocketed industry lobbyists. The real way, however, isn’t in Washington or on Wall Street, it’s on Main Street. To that end, Rhoades has developed a concept he calls the “Bona-Fide Fiduciary” (or “BFF” for those young hipsters out there). He says “BFF’s will distinguish themselves via the Consumer Checklist.” He could foresee a day when a public service campaign tells investors to “Ask your adviser these questions and get the answers in writing.”

Already, Rhoades sees BFFs making inroads. While an industry sponsored study claims billions of dollars in retirement assets will leave brokers if the DOL’s proposed Fiduciary Rule were to include IRA, Rhoades says what the industry doesn’t tell you is that it’s really a migration already taking place. He cites Cerulli research which shows, from 2011 to 2014, the wirehouse market share in IRA Rollovers has fallen from 41% to 34% while the Fee-Only RIA (i.e., fiduciary) market share has risen from 12% to 14%.

Rhoades ended this portion of his talk with a statement that “expert financial and investment advisers deserve professional compensation.” He noted that, while adviser fees have dropped by two-thirds since 2000, an overemphasis on fees is giving clients the wrong impression that investment advice is a commodity. Products are a commodity. Service it not. And he told an old story to prove this point.

“One day,” began Rhoades, “a lady walking in Paris happened to see Picasso sketching the Eiffel Tower. ‘Mr. Picasso,’ she asked, ‘can you paint my picture?’ The old master replied, ‘Why, yes!’ and in five minutes drew an impressive Picasso-esque portrait of the woman. When asked by the woman how much she owed him, he said, ‘Fifty Thousand Francs.’ ‘Fifty Thousand Francs!’ screeched the woman, ‘but it only took five minutes to draw.’ Without losing a beat, Picasso snapped back, ‘Madam, you have only seen the final five minutes of this portrait’s creation, but, I assure you, it took me a lifetime to create it.’”

Low fees, it turns out, are no substitute for veteran experience.

About Author

Christopher Carosa, CTFA

Christopher Carosa, CTFA

Related Articles


  1. Ron Rhoades
    Ron Rhoades April 24, 13:37

    Chris, thank you for writing and publishing such an excellent summary of my remarks.

    Sadly, I found out recently that, indeed, the SEC is on the path I have feared. The key SEC staffer writing rules under Dodd-Frank Sect. 913 has now stated that the fiduciary standard is nothing more than the suitability standard. See my blog post at:

    These are sad times – for consumers of investment advisory and financial planning services, for advocates of the fiduciary standard, for those who desire that financial planning become a true profession, and for America itself.

    Wall Street’s money and power, through the SEC’s revolving door, and via Congress’s campaign coffers and revolving doors, poses a formidable obstacle. However, as you suggest this is only one of a series of battles. And this battle is not over.

    While hope for a positive outcome diminishes, it is still a battle worthy of fighting. Hence, the fight will go on. And I will continue to assist where I can, by educating policy makers regarding the reality of the true fiduciary standard and what it requires.

    Yet, as reality begins to set in, already those who continue to desire a true profession founded upon a bona fide fiduciary standard ask: “If the government will not enforce a bona fide fiduciary standard, what next?” The answer to this question may well determine the path to be taken, toward a greater future for all, in the coming years.

  2. Dennis Myhre, AIC
    Dennis Myhre, AIC February 05, 11:30


    I re-read this featured story you wrote last year on Ron Rhoades…It’s sad when we lose a strong advocate for a fiduciary standard like Ron Rhoades. I checked out his blog link but it is full of spam….so he must not be monitoring it.

    If you still have contact with him, please ask him review at least the home page sliders on my new website…. It will still be several weeks before the site is fully up and running, but the sliders will interest him…. and perhaps give him renewed interest in his campaign. The lobbyists are alive and well in Washington, DC, and therein lies the influence with the SEC as well. We must stop this fraud and corruption…. soon Congress will enact legislation to force all employers to have a 401(k) plan for their employees, and the employee will also be forced to invest. Under the present standards, the 401(k) marketplace will then experience fraud and corruption that will soon bankrupt the system.


    Dennis Myhre

Only registered users can comment. Login

Vote in our Poll

The 401(k) Fiduciary Solutions Book

Order Your 401k Fiduciary Solutions book today!


The materials at this web site are maintained for the sole purpose of providing general information about fiduciary law, tax accounting and investments and do not under any circumstances constitute legal, accounting or investment advice. You should not act or refrain from acting based on these materials without first obtaining the advice of an appropriate professional. Please carefully read the terms and conditions for using this site. This website contains links to third-party websites. We are not responsible for, and make no representations or endorsements with respect to, third-party websites, or with respect to any information, products or services that may be provided by or through such websites.